JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 4, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto

✓Claimant Nixon Torres Carcamo

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud De Aclaración De La Sentencia C-280 De 2007. Por Regla General No Procede La Aclaración De Sentencias De Control De Constitucionalidad Ni De Revision De Tutela. Se Admite La Procedencia Excepcional Cuando Se Cumplen Los Supuestos Previstos En El Articulo 309 Del Cpc. Rechazada Por Improcedente
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Aclaracion Sentencia De Constitucionalidad
  • Rechazar por presentación extemporánea
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. RECHAZAR por improcedente, la solicitud formulada por el ciudadano Nixon Torres Carcamo para que se aclare la sentencia C-280 de 2007.
  2. Segundo. Comuniquese la presente providencia al interesado.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto
Reporting justice
✓
Jaime Araujo Rentería
Concurring opinion
✓
Alvaro Tafur Galvis
Impedido
✓
Clara Ines Vargas Hernandez
Magistrado
✓
Jaime Córdoba Triviño
Magistrado
✓
Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa
Magistrado
✓
Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra
Magistrado
✓
Nilson Pinilla Pinilla
Magistrado
✓
Rodrigo Escobar Gil
Presidente
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
← cites 8cited by 1 →A. 165/07C-113/93 — Dec. 2067/91. Art. 21 Incs. 2 Y 4 Y Art. 24. Efectos De Las Sentencias De Constitucionalidad. Aclaracion De Sentencias. Inexequibles. · cited 391 timesC-113/931993A. 053/97 — Memorial Relacionado Con La Sentencia T-500/97. · cited 54 timesA. 053/971997A. 004/00 — Solicitud De Aclaracion De Sentencias C-383/99 Y C-700/99. · cited 36 timesA. 004/002000C-280/07 — Liquidacion De Entidad Publica. Prohibición De Celebrar Pactos, Convenciones Colectivas Y Adelantar Negociaciones Colectivas, Que No Estén D · cited 29 timesC-280/072007A. 058/02 — Aclaracion Sentencia C-233/02 · cited 15 timesA. 058/022002A. 018/04 — Aclaracion Sentencia C-041/04. Negada · cited 10 timesA. 018/042004A. 003/03 — Aclaracion Sentencia C-876/02 · cited 10 timesA. 003/032003A. 244/06 — Solicitud De Aclaracion De La Sentencia C-342 De 2006. Excepcionalmente La Corte Ha Admitido La Procedencia De Solicitudes De Aclaracion De · cited 6 timesA. 244/062006SU.377/14 · cited 153 timesSU.377/142014
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites8
See all 8 →
Cited by1

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.